Hockey gave me a chance to go travel all over the world
and then now here I am today playing professionally.
Before, it was you know either college hockey
or if you were fortunate and good enough
you could play on the national team and you know there wasn't really anything in-between.
Women's ice hockey is so cool because there's just a tremendous amount of
skill and talent that goes into it particularly at this Boston Pride level.
Dr. Jackson and I are the team physicians for the Boston Pride and we attend every game.
We look for injuries, we attend to the injuries, and attend to the rehabilitation afterwards.
It's really fun working with a team like this,
especially a female team.
It kind of brings me back to my college days.
I played tennis in division one in college,
that's where I sort of saw the role of the team physician
and how they work with the trainer's in the students.
It's fast, it's quick, girls are strong and physical.
You know injuries are going to happen.
I got injured here last year.
I hurt my shoulder going in the boards awkwardly.
Dr. Jackson and Dr. d'Hemecourt were right there with me on the bench
and got me in for an appointment right away
so it was really high quality treatment and I was really happy to have them here.
They're fun and energetic in the hallway,
they always give us a fist pumps going out to the ice,
they fit right in really with the atmosphere.
It's a lot more than just taking care of the musculoskeletal or medical problem.
These athletes come in and they all want to play.
They're the most motivated people in the world so
you get involved with that full psyche of seeing a team win,
getting the enthusiasm of the team,
it's just a lot of fun.
For more infomation >> Caring for the Boston Pride | Boston Children's Hospital - Duration: 1:41.-------------------------------------------
Back on Cloud9's victory : Inteview with Skadoodle - ELEAGUE Boston Major 2018 - Duration: 10:10.
For more infomation >> Back on Cloud9's victory : Inteview with Skadoodle - ELEAGUE Boston Major 2018 - Duration: 10:10. -------------------------------------------
Boston Major VS the World - Duration: 5:07.
Is CS:GO Dying?
Just kidding.
I think the community's in a good place right now.
CS:GO's first major of 2018 was a massive success, the finals, one of the greatest the
game has ever seen.
And this was reflected in the numbers, the finals managing the highest peak viewing number
ever, according to the viewers listed in the match description here.
The previous record was 5,000 fewer, set exactly a year ago during the Atlanta finals.
The game's doing well!
Let's be happy for a moment.
And now let's compare it to other majors, just out of curiosity.
I didn't bother listing the ones before Dreamhack 2014 since it's harder to get
information about them.
CS:GO has nicely tracked and recorded every match of every major since then and I simply
went through and put them all into some graphs- so you don't have to.
Of course, peaks only represent the most successful second of the match.
I would rather we had average numbers to compare, but hey.
What I did instead was to get the AVERAGE of each matches peak to try and get a more
accurate representation of how much the majors were being viewed, and here were my findings.
Boston's quarter-finals were the 3rd most watched of all time, behind Columbus 2016
and Cologne 2015.
Its semis were 4th most watched, behind Cologne 2015, Atlanta 2017 and Columbus 2016.
And its finals were also 4th most watched of all time, behind Columbus 2016, Atlanta
2017 and Cologne 2015.
So CS:GO's viewbase at the start of 2018 is healthy, but not the biggest it's ever
been.
This graph helps put its current situation into perspective, and I think you'll agree
that Boston was a respectably viewed major.
While we're on this chart, there are some other interesting things I'll quickly cover.
I would normally expect semi-final matches on average to get more views than quarter-finals,
but you can see that it isn't always the case- the last 2 majors have had almost exactly
the same views for both!
This has got to be down to which teams are playing and you'd expect a match between
2 of the most popular teams to be the most viewed, even if it is earlier on in the event.
Still, hasn't stopped the finals from always being the most viewed so far… apart from
with Dreamhack 2014 where they were SLIGHTLY behind the semis.
Thanks for ruining my point, 2014.
This is all stuff that I covered in more depth last year, following the Atlanta major.
I suggest you check the video out- I'll leave it here in the cards to click on.
I talked about the importance of which teams are playing.
I also speculated that the time between majors mattered and that the less popular events
had always occurred when there hadn't been much time since the previous one.
But this hasn't been the case since- Krakow and now Boston have both had a 6 month gap
since the one before and yet Krakow still underperformed.
I now just think that majors alternate between successful and disappointing for absolutely
no reason… but that doesn't bode well for the next major, which rumour has it will
be hosted by Faceit in London.
I wish them all the best to break the curse.
And while we're at it can we please have some decent English teams?
So, the Esports side of CS:GO seems to be doing well.
What about the people actually playing the game?
Steamcharts is a great resource for this, showing the average player numbers per month,
as well as the peak.
Player Unknowns somehow continues to grow month on month, it's utterly insane how
it's still rising.
And although CS:GO's growth is nowhere near as impressive, you may be surprised by how
well the game is performing.
I'm honestly surprised.
I considered 2015 to be the year the game took off but the viewerbase has remained remarkably
strong since then.
2016 as a whole saw significantly higher average and peak numbers of players, and 2017 managed
even higher average numbers, although peak numbers have dropped a tiny bit.
Isn't this video happy and positive!
Makes a change doesn't it.
But let's try to see the negative in everything, as is tradition.
The tournament went as well as it could have done: it was well hosted, had been a long
time since the previous one, it had excellent matches and an epic EU VS NA final that extended
into overtime.
And yet, despite all of that, it still hasn't been as viewed as much on average as earlier
majors were, even though those weren't anywhere near as 'perfect'.
It's easy to see the new record-breaking peak viewing figure and to think that CS:GO
is more popular than it has ever been before, but in reality, the game is beginning to slip.
Player-wise, this January has seen the highest peak player numbers since March last year
and the highest average since April.
But both these figures are below where they were last January, which had 12,000 more players
on average and a peak that was 100,000 higher.
After that, it was only down-hill for the rest of the year.
So, if this January is the same, then it will be a disappointing year.
Hype from the tournament will soon die down.
It won't be long before players expect more from the game again!
These spikes in viewers and players aren't the start of a golden age- but rather, last
gasps before the inevitable collapse!
Perhaps CS:GO is dying.
Starting next month.
-------------------------------------------
How To Get Six Pack Abs [NO WORKOUT] | Brock and Boston - Duration: 5:53.
For more infomation >> How To Get Six Pack Abs [NO WORKOUT] | Brock and Boston - Duration: 5:53. -------------------------------------------
Highlights NBA || Boston Celtics vs Denver Nuggets || Januari 29/2018 - Duration: 9:30.
Highlights NBA || Boston Celtics vs Denver Nuggets || Januari 29/2018
-------------------------------------------
The Outlet Pass: Why the Boston Celtics Are Struggling to Score - Duration: 12:03.
The Outlet Pass: Why the Boston Celtics Are Struggling to Score
Why is Boston's Offense Suddenly so Bad.
Over the past three years, the Boston Celtics ended each regular season with the third, fifth, and second highest assist percentage in the NBA, respectively.
Ball movement was their soul, and—arguably even more so than a well-connected defense—best reflected how Brad Stevens wanted his teams to operate.
Now 51 games into his fifth season as head coach, Stevens's Celtics rank 14th in assist percentage, and a disturbing 22nd since New Year's Day.
Boston owns the NBA's fourth-worst offense over its last 15 games, with only two teams finishing inside the three-point line on a higher percentage of unassisted baskets.
How they got here, and it that relates to a path towards less selfish tendencies, is a slight Catch-22.
Like most teams, the Celtics are less efficient whenever their most gifted player is on the sideline—according to Cleaning the Glass, Boston's offensive rating is 13.7 points per 100 possessions better with Kyrie Irving than without, which ranks in the 99th percentile (!) compared to every other point guard who qualifies.
But one consistent trend has been how Irving's presence affects their assist rate, which is never higher than when Irving is on the bench.
This is not a criticism.
It's also not a coincidence.
During his magical run to a fifth-place finish on the MVP ballot last year, only 9.1 percent of Isaiah Thomas's possessions were isolations, according to Synergy Sports.
Irving is nearly at 16 percent right now.
The Celtics will sometimes feed their All-Star starter just above the elbow, then move fatalistically, deep down knowing how the play is meant to unfold.
Additionally, 64.2 percent of Irving's field goals are unassisted, while Thomas was only at 56.5 percent.
It's not just Irving, though.
Last year, eight Celtics had at least 60 percent of their two-point baskets come by way of an assist (not including Al Horford and Gerald Green, who were at 59 percent).
This year only Aron Baynes, Semi Ojeleye, and Daniel Theis are above that mark.
Stagnancy affects everything, from where the offense fires away (a higher percentage of Boston's field goal attempts are from the mid-range this season) to how frequently it allows them to get quality shots/draw fouls around the rim.
The Celtics are playing slower, sliding away from the analytics-friendly shot chart they spent the last few years warming up to.
(They ranked sixth in the percentage of their shots that were layups last season. Right now, they're down to 23rd.).
The easy explanation for all this change is a shift in personnel—Kelly Olynyk is way, way, way better suited for how Stevens wants to play than Marcus Morris—and just, like, the fact that they're super young and stretching a ton of inexperienced players in roles they otherwise wouldn't have on a top-ranked team.
In 2018, only Theis, Horford, and Irving are shooting above 39 percent from behind the three-point line.
Rozier and Jaylen Brown were each 13-for-46 heading into Monday night's game against the Denver Nuggets, while Morris, Tatum, and Smart were a combined 30 percent.
When your entire team is stuck in a slump, not only will your offense understandably suffer, but the floor will cramp against defenses that can just switch and help without fear of getting torched from deep.
Compounding the issue is a roster that, outside Irving, only enlists two perimeter-oriented shot creators, in Rozier and Smart.
But that duo is noticeably less stoic than last year, thrilled with the first decent shot they see and content with doing a favor for the opposition, especially if their man goes under a screen or gives them the type of space that suggests a pull-up three is exactly what they want to see.
Some of it might be due to an understandable lack of trust, being that so many Celtics logged zero minutes beside one another (or any other NBA players, for that matter) before this season began.
Even Horford, someone whose general demeanor suggests he's never burned the roof of his mouth on a hot slice of pizza, has rushed some shots this year (his odd pull up in transition from just above the free-throw line at Oracle on Saturday night is in some ways a perfect encapsulation of Boston's problems).
But Smart has proven his worth as an intelligent pick-and-roll playmaker, while Rozier is dynamic enough to slither through the first layer of any defense to open up opportunities for teammates elsewhere on the floor.
The patience seen above is exactly what Boston needs more of when Irving isn't in the game.
Shane Larkin passes up a decent look early in the possession, relocates to the opposite wing, then nails a three.
In the six-pass sequence below, the ball swings from side to side.
Just about everybody on the floor drives and cuts with force and makes Denver guard multiple actions before Theis steps out to knock down the open three.
Tatum will be instant offense in due time—picture him with a post game!—but as a 19-year-old rookie he isn't ready to commandeer a second-unit by himself.
Lately he's drifted into these predictable, archaic one-on-one confrontations that don't suit what his current role should be.
Expanding his game is nice, and encouraging him to attack mismatches is great, but too often he does so without rushing the rim and forcing help.
Irving is an illusionist who can basically take whatever shot he wants and have it be graded on a scale from "that probably should've triggered the sprinkler system" to "please pass me a bible.
" His three-point rate has never been higher and Boston boasts a top-five effective field goal percentage when he's on the floor.
But just because Batman exists doesn't mean every police officer in Gotham can retire.
The Celtics should still make more of an effort to run their motion-based offense, use pick-and-rolls to set up other pick-and-rolls, attack closeouts, and get back to the inside-out tactics they had a decent amount of success with last season.
Their offensive woes aren't a debilitating concern because so much of them go back to poor shotmaking in a small sample size.
Their three-point percentage will regress (Boston remains one of the 10 most accurate shooting teams from deep in the league, and they made 17 threes in their most recent game) and things will naturally open up once Gordon Hayward returns next season, solidifying at least one All-Star on the floor at all-times.
In the meantime, it wouldn't hurt for them to get everyone involved a bit more than they currently are.
Its easier said than done, but ultimately necessary if they want to get back to the conference finals.
Dejounte Murray Hitting the Offensive Glass.
Dejounte Murray's stock will never be lower than it is today.
He's shooting 44 percent from the floor and rarely acknowledges the basket's existence when dribbling behind the three-point line; the San Antonio Spurs struggle to generate quality looks when he's on the floor and they really struggle to score at the rim.
My response to that: Buy all the Murray stock you can afford, then sell your X-Box and buy some more.
It may take some time for the 21-year-old to develop a reliable outside shot, but he has intangible qualities—mostly connected to his wingspan and defensive anticipation (among all players who average at least 15 minutes and have appeared in at least 10 games, nobody has a lower defensive rating this season—that rationalize Gregg Popovich's decision to bump him into the starting lineup.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét