Auto news on Youtube Dec 31 2018

ＳＵＢＳＣＲＩＢＥ NOW

ＳＵＢＳＣＲＩＢＥ NOW

For more infomation >> Golden Opportunity to Get Uruguay Tourist Visa 2018 - Duration: 10:43.

-------------------------------------------

How to get your scientific paper published: Responding to Reviewers - Duration: 5:31.

Critics of something that you worked really hard on and that you put it so

many years and months is working on it's always going to be brutal but what

I always try to keep in mind is that even if the comments sound

ridiculous and they are really really negative what can I make out of these

comments is it something in the in the manuscript that might have raised that

reviewers concerns is the concern actually reasonable and if so then what

can I do to address it if really the the the the comment of the reviewer makes no

sense then probably there is something in your manuscript that has kind of led

the person to reach that conclusion so the only really thing you can do is to

try to find where this specific thing is and try to correct it so to avoid and

having this criticism from other reviewers.

responding to reviews it is always the

same in the way in the same story the paper except you need to really try to

reply every comment and not to neglect them or push aside not to trust the

reviewers to act as if to reduce supposed to improve your paper react to

them constructively always and always try to do what they suggest and try to

hope that will improve your paper because your first we actually put years

of work into this paper and you reread it a gazillion and a half times and you

advise them read it half a million times and you really think it's good and they

come back with remarks and you're like what did it you didn't understand or the

only thing that because they not so they want to be cited or whatever it's a

natural reaction going get drunk sleep run in the woods do what gets over your

stress then come back and think okay I have to get these reviews to be on this

paper and chances are they're scientists like me or my boss we're just trying to

do the job the best and just you know this will misunderstanding so every time

not here's your food clarified every time

could be added edit if it's of course a year of experiments don't bit usually

right very constructively I think responding to reviewers is something

that you learn slowly that you should put aside what you think makes the best

article but to really try to incorporate all their comments and always be very

diplomatic about oh that's a very good point that we forgot even if it's

something you thought about and you think is not really important for

another paper you really have to take an account as many as their comment and of

course it's something really doesn't make sense then you can also explain why

but try not to have too many answer like this because otherwise the editor is not

good I like it and if it's sent back to the reviewers to check again they really

not gonna like it if you don't take in consideration their their advice and so

yes sometimes it's strange because you get one round of reviewers telling you

to do something and you modify it and then it's sent to another journal with

other reviewers who ask you to put it back the way it was before so there

isn't there isn't a real one way to have your paper and but I think it's really

something about finding you like a kind of equilibrium between what you want how

you want to have your paper and what the reviewers are I think my advice is to be

persistent and not to give up not to take a no for an answer

because in my experience you know but you say the work is

scientifically sound so they will be our way to publish it and it may be that

isn't will not be you know your favorite journal but still there will be a place

which is hopefully then still accessible by the rest of the community where your

work will be featured and some major revisions and they thought that was a

rejection and they didn't pursue until they want they open their account and so

that actually their previous paper is still waiting for revisions and so but

there are some kids where it's a rejection and of course you have to look

at the reason for this rejection but if this is based on some misunderstanding

or some problems of yes that that can be fixed easily then there certainly a good

reason to try to fix these things and resubmit and explain this very

so there are no tricks for publishing a paper it's all hard work that's that's

the point how do you get your paper published most importantly make a really

good work scientifically sound work should get

published and it's just a matter of persistence

you